Mazda Xedos 6 1998 vs Rover 400 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Xedos 6 engine produces 4 HP more power than Rover 400, but torque is 15 NM less than Rover 400. Thanks to more power Mazda Xedos 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.6 | |
| Mazda Xedos 6 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 6 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 9 | Used also on Rover 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Xedos 6 is 7 cm longer than the Rover 400, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Xedos 6 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 6 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Rover 400. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`710 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 6 has
|
Rover 400 has
| |