Mazda Xedos 6 1992 vs Rover 400 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 - 147 HP | 86 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 175 NM | 127 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 13.7 seconds | 8.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 9.3 | 5.3 - 10.2 | |
|
Mazda Xedos 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 400. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Xedos 6 is 7 cm longer than the Rover 400, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Xedos 6 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 6 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Rover 400. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`685 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 6 has
|
Rover 400 has
| |