Mazda Premacy 1999 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Mazda Premacy engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Renault Scenic. Despite the higher power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Premacy could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Premacy consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 13 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Premacy is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mazda Premacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda Premacy, so Mazda Premacy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |