Mazda MX-3 1991 vs Mazda MX-6 1991

 
Mazda MX-3
1991 - 1994
Mazda MX-6
1991 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP116 HP
Torque: 135 NM173 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds10.4 seconds
Mazda MX-3 engine produces 26 HP less power than Mazda MX-6, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Mazda MX-6. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.48.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km9.0 l/100km
The Mazda MX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-6, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-6.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
610 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Mazda MX-6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km520'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MX-6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years6 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 323Used also on Mazda 626
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.62 m
Width: 1.70 m1.75 m
Height: 1.31 m1.31 m
Mazda MX-3 is smaller.
Mazda MX-3 is 40 cm shorter than the Mazda MX-6, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 289 litres404 litres
Mazda MX-6 has more luggage space.
Mazda MX-3 has 115 litres less trunk space than the Mazda MX-6.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda MX-6, which means Mazda MX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4751`510
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mazda MX-6 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv