Mazda MX-3 1991 vs Mazda 323 1998

 
Mazda MX-3
1991 - 1994
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP88 HP
Torque: 135 NM132 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds11.8 seconds
Mazda MX-3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda MX-3 engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Mazda MX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.47.5
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.7 l/100km
The Mazda 323 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway870 km on highway
610 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years10 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 323Used also on Mazda Demio
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 323 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.04 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.31 m1.40 m
Mazda MX-3 is 18 cm longer than the Mazda 323, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 289 litres304 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda MX-3 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 323. This could mean that the Mazda MX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`4751`585
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 1000800
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-3 has
  • more dynamic
Mazda 323 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv