Mazda MX-3 1991 vs Ford Puma 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Mazda MX-3 engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford Puma, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford Puma. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.3 | |
| Mazda MX-3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MX-3 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Mazda MX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Mazda MX-3 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda MX-3 is 24 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 289 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Puma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-3 has
|
Ford Puma has
| |