Mazda MX-3 1991 vs Ford Puma 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 | 1.4 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 135 HP | 90 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 160 NM | 122 - 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | 9.2 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 9.5 | 7.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Mazda MX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Puma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Mazda MX-3 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda MX-3 is 24 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MX-3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 289 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Puma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`474 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Puma has
| |