Mazda CX-7 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-7 engine produces 3 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.5 | |
| Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 10 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`099 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |