Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-7 engine produces 94 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.6 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |