Mazda CX-7 2009 vs BMW 5 series 2011

 
Mazda CX-7
2009 - 2012
BMW 5 series
2011 - 2013
Body: Crossover / SUVSedan
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 260 HP245 HP
Torque: 380 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds6.2 seconds
Mazda CX-7 engine produces 15 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 30 NM more than BMW 5 series. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.46.8
Real fuel consumption: 11.6 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda CX-7 consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 540 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-7 consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 69 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle1020 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway1270 km on highway
590 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Mazda CX-7 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 320'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 8 years7 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 3Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The BMW 5 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.90 m
Width: 1.87 m1.86 m
Height: 1.65 m1.46 m
Mazda CX-7 is 20 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 18 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres520 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
774 litresno data
BMW 5 series has more luggage space.
Mazda CX-7 has 65 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`220
Safety:
BMW 5 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 5 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 640012 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-7 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv