Mazda 626 1995 vs Mazda 626 1991
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 117 HP | 117 HP | |
Torque: | 173 NM | 173 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Mazda 626 1995 and Mazda 626 1991 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 626 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.5 | |
Mazda 626 1995 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1991, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 1995 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 520'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 1995 and Mazda 626 1991 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 455 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
Mazda 626 1995 has 3 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626 1991. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |