Mazda 626 1999 vs Mazda 323 2001
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Mazda 626 and Mazda 323 have the same engine power, but Mazda 626 torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 323. Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 1040 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 34 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1000 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 147 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 323. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |