Mazda 626 1990 vs Audi 100 1988
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 49 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.0 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 626 is 20 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`250 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Audi 100 has
| |