Mazda 626 1988 vs VAZ 2104 1984
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 101 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 39 HP more power than VAZ 2104, whereas torque is 64 NM more than VAZ 2104. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 42 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 626) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (VAZ 2104) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 48 cm longer than the VAZ 2104, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 345 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
VAZ 2104 has
| |