Mazda 626 1988 vs Audi 100 1988

 
Mazda 626
1988 - 1992
Audi 100
1988 - 1989
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 61 HP69 HP
Torque: 121 NM123 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 20.8 seconds17 seconds
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 626 engine produces 8 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.97.3
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 626 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 20 years10 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 626 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.79 m
Width: 1.69 m1.81 m
Height: 1.46 m1.42 m
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mazda 626 is 20 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data644 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1920 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 9451`840
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 22001200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv