Mazda 626 1992 vs Citroen Xantia 1995

 
Mazda 626
1992 - 1996
Citroen Xantia
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP135 HP
Torque: 180 NM180 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds10.3 seconds
Citroen Xantia is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 626 engine produces 19 HP less power than Citroen Xantia, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.59.4
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 626 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.66 m
Width: 1.69 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mazda 626 is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen Xantia, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1315 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7801`200
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Citroen Xantia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 626, so Citroen Xantia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 600600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Citroen Xantia has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv