Mazda 626 1992 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 153 NM | 158 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 26 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
750 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 626 is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | 1610 litres | |
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Mazda 626 has 110 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 295 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`950 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | low | |
Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |