Mazda 626 1992 vs Ford Mondeo 1996

 
Mazda 626
1992 - 1997
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP116 HP
Torque: 153 NM158 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds11.3 seconds
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 626 engine produces 26 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.38.3
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
750 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.67 m
Width: 1.69 m1.75 m
Height: 1.43 m1.39 m
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mazda 626 is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1315 litres1610 litres
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space.
Mazda 626 has 110 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 295 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7601`950
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Mazda 626 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 600600
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • fewer faults
Ford Mondeo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv