Mazda 626 1999 vs Hyundai Lantra 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 42 HP more power than Hyundai Lantra, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Hyundai Lantra. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.4 | |
| Mazda 626 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 23 cm longer than the Hyundai Lantra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1677 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`935 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
| |