Mazda 626 1999 vs Skoda Octavia 1998

 
Mazda 626
1999 - 2002
Skoda Octavia
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP110 HP
Torque: 230 NM235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds11.4 seconds
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 626 and Skoda Octavia have the same engine power, but Mazda 626 torque is 5 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.35.2
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 626 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 165 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway1300 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.68 m4.51 m
Width: 1.71 m1.73 m
Height: 1.52 m1.45 m
Mazda 626 is 17 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres548 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1677 litres1512 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 has 63 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 165 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9351`865
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Skoda Octavia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 626, so Skoda Octavia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower price
Skoda Octavia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv