Mazda 626 1991 vs Mazda 626 1995
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 1991 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 1991 engine produces 50 HP more power than Mazda 626 1995, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Mazda 626 1995. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 1991 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mazda 626 1995 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 1991 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1995, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 1991 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 626 1995 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 1991 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 9, Mazda MX-6 | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 626 1991 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 1991 and Mazda 626 1995 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 452 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
| Mazda 626 1991 has 3 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626 1995. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 1991 is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 626 1995, which means Mazda 626 1991 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |