Mazda 626 1991 vs Mazda 626 1995
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mazda 626 1991 and Mazda 626 1995 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 626 1991 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 626 1991 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1995, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 1991 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 1991 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1995. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 1991 and Mazda 626 1995 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 452 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
| Mazda 626 1991 has 3 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626 1995. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |