Mazda 626 1994 vs Toyota Camry 2001
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Camry is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 76 HP less power than Toyota Camry, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Toyota Camry. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Previa | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Camry might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 12 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |