Mazda 626 1994 vs SAAB 9000 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9000 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 74 HP less power than SAAB 9000, whereas torque is 43 NM less than SAAB 9000. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 9.9 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9000, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 is 6 cm shorter than the SAAB 9000, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.3 metres less than that of the SAAB 9000. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
SAAB 9000 has
| |