Mazda 626 1995 vs Opel Vectra 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 76 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 172 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
Mazda 626 engine produces 6 HP less power than Opel Vectra, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Opel Vectra. Despite less power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.9 | |
The Opel Vectra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vectra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
Opel Vectra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Vectra engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 20 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Opel Vectra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 is 22 cm longer than the Opel Vectra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | 790 litres | |
Opel Vectra has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Opel Vectra. This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Vectra (by 43 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`870 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Mazda 626 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Vectra, so Mazda 626 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Opel Vectra has
| |