Mazda 626 1995 vs Ford Escort 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 16 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.0 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 56 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Escort, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Ford Escort has
| |