Mazda 626 1999 vs Toyota Camry 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 626
1999 - 2002
Toyota Camry
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)2.4 - 3.0 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 100 - 167 HP152 - 186 HP
Torque: 152 - 230 NM218 - 273 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 - 12.5 seconds9.1 - 10.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 8.98.6 - 11.0
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Camry.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.61 m4.82 m
Width: 1.72 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.50 m
Mazda 626 is smaller.
Mazda 626 is 21 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 502 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`648~ 1`600
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 10003400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Toyota Camry has
  • only petrol engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv