Mazda 626 1999 vs Hyundai Elantra 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 167 HP | 105 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 143 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.9 | 6.4 - 8.8 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Elantra. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 is 9 cm longer than the Hyundai Elantra, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 87 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`648 | ~ 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |