Mazda 626 1988 vs Mercedes E class 1989

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Mazda 626 1988 - 1992	Mercedes E class 1989 - 1993
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Wheel drive type:	Front wheel drive (FWD)	Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
	Mazda 626 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mercedes E class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines:	1.8 - 2.2	2.0 - 3.2
Performance
Power:	61 - 116 HP	75 - 220 HP
Torque:	121 - 178 NM	126 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	10.5 - 20.8 seconds	8 - 21.7 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	6.9 - 9.2	7.2 - 11.9
	Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes E class. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.59 m	4.76 m
Width:	1.69 m	1.74 m
Height:	1.46 m	1.49 m
	Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 17 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	no data	no data
Turning diameter:	10.8 meters	11.2 meters
	The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 1`066	~ 1`826

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	above average	high
Average price (€):	2200	2400
Pros and Cons:	Mazda 626 has lower fuel consumption lower price	Mercedes E klase has available with 4x4 drive fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Mazda 626 1988 vs Mercedes E class 1989

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions