Mazda 626 1992 vs Volvo 850 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | 2.3 - 2.4 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 - 116 HP | 140 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 - 180 NM | 206 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.6 seconds | 7.5 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 8.8 | 9.1 - 9.7 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo 850. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo 850, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`783 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Volvo 850 has
| |