Mazda 626 1992 vs Citroen Xantia 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 1.8 - 2.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 - 116 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 - 180 NM | 135 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.6 seconds | 10 - 18 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 8.8 | 7.0 - 10.3 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xantia. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 626 is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen Xantia, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`783 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
| |