Mazda 626 1999 vs Hyundai Lantra 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 626
1999 - 2002
Hyundai Lantra
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.01.5 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 136 HP68 - 139 HP
Torque: 152 - 230 NM120 - 182 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 - 12.5 seconds8.8 - 16.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.3 - 9.16.4 - 9.7
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Lantra. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.68 m4.45 m
Width: 1.71 m1.70 m
Height: 1.52 m1.40 m
Mazda 626 is larger.
Mazda 626 is 23 cm longer than the Hyundai Lantra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 12 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1677 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Lantra.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`866~ 1`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 600no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv