Mazda 626 1991 vs Toyota Carina E 1992

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 626
1991 - 1995
Toyota Carina E
1992 - 1996
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 76 - 167 HP73 - 175 HP
Torque: 157 - 221 NM132 - 186 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 14.7 seconds8.4 - 16.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.8 - 9.65.8 - 8.5
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Carina E. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.53 m
Width: 1.75 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.41 m
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 626 is 17 cm longer than the Toyota Carina E, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
747 litres1250 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Carina E (by 503 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`700~ 1`684
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 6001200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower price
Toyota Carina E has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv