Mazda 626 1995 vs Opel Vectra 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 - 167 HP | 75 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 - 221 NM | 128 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | 8.5 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.3 | 5.9 - 10.7 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Vectra. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vectra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 is 22 cm longer than the Opel Vectra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | 790 litres | |
|
Opel Vectra has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Opel Vectra. This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Vectra (by 43 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`700 | ~ 1`817 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Opel Vectra has
| |