Mazda 626 1997 vs Opel Vectra 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 136 HP | 75 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 220 NM | 128 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.6 seconds | 8.5 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.9 | 5.9 - 10.7 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Vectra. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vectra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 10 cm longer than the Opel Vectra, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 790 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 22 litres more trunk space than the Opel Vectra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Vectra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`703 | ~ 1`817 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 6.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Opel Vectra has
| |