Mazda 626 1997 vs Skoda Octavia 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 626
1997 - 1999
Skoda Octavia
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.01.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 90 - 136 HP60 - 150 HP
Torque: 145 - 220 NM118 - 235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 - 12.6 seconds8.5 - 18.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 8.95.1 - 9.2
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, a Mazda 626 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Skoda Octavia.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.51 m
Width: 1.71 m1.73 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres530 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1330 litres
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 has 28 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`703~ 1`786
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Skoda Octavia has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv