Mazda 626 1997 vs Skoda Octavia 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 136 HP | 60 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 145 - 220 NM | 118 - 235 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.6 seconds | 8.5 - 18.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.9 | 5.1 - 9.2 | |
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, a Mazda 626 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 530 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1330 litres | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 has 28 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`703 | ~ 1`786 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |