Mazda 626 1999 vs Toyota Corolla 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 626
1999 - 2002
Toyota Corolla
2004 - 2007
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.01.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 136 HP90 - 131 HP
Torque: 152 - 230 NM130 - 280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 - 12.5 seconds10.2 - 14.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 8.94.8 - 7.8
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.40 m
Width: 1.71 m1.71 m
Height: 1.43 m1.47 m
Mazda 626 is 19 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres473 litres
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 626 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`671~ 1`694
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 8002800
Rating in user reviews: 6.2/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Toyota Corolla has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv