Mazda 626 1999 vs SAAB 9-3 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 115 - 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 177 - 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 6.8 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 6.2 - 10.8 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 is 4 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.1 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`671 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |