Mazda 626 1999 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 90 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 137 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 9.2 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 5.4 - 8.3 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Carisma. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 11 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Carisma, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 62 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`671 | ~ 1`696 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |