Mazda 626 1999 vs Honda Accord 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 105 - 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 140 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 9.8 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 6.4 - 9.2 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 1 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 626 has 52 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. The Honda Accord may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`671 | ~ 1`914 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Honda Accord has
| |