Mazda 6 2010 vs BMW 3 series 2010

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2013
BMW 3 series
2010 - 2013
Body: SedanCoupe
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 170 HP156 HP
Torque: 226 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 seconds8.9 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 14 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 26 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.07.9
Mazda 6 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway1060 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda TributeInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.61 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.40 m
Mazda 6 is larger.
Mazda 6 is 14 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 519 litres440 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 79 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`810
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 440010 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv