Mazda 6 2012 vs Mazda 6 2015

 
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 192 HP192 HP
Torque: 256 NM256 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds7.8 seconds
Mazda 6 2012 and Mazda 6 2015 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.5
Real fuel consumption: 8.0 l/100km8.0 l/100km
By specification Mazda 6 2012 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1190 km on highway
770 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.87 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2012 and Mazda 6 2015 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 489 litres438 litres
Mazda 6 2012 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 2012 has 51 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2015.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2012 is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6 2015, which means Mazda 6 2012 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 660017 800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv