Mazda 6 2012 vs Mazda 6 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 2012 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 2012 and Mazda 6 2015 have the same engine power, but Mazda 6 2012 torque is 170 NM more than Mazda 6 2015. Mazda 6 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.1 | |
|
The Mazda 6 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 2012 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2012 and Mazda 6 2015 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 438 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 2012 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 2012 has 51 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2015. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2012 is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6 2015, which means Mazda 6 2012 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
| |