Mazda 6 2012 vs Honda Accord 2011

 
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Honda Accord
2011 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 380 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds9.4 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 and Honda Accord have the same engine power, but Mazda 6 torque is 30 NM more than Honda Accord. Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.95.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.2 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1580 km in combined cycle1220 km in combined cycle
1820 km on highway1470 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption1040 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Civic
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.73 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Mazda 6 is 15 cm longer than the Honda Accord, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 489 litres467 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 22 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`090
Safety: no data
Quality:Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 66006800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv