Mazda 6 2008 vs Volkswagen Passat 2005

 
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Volkswagen Passat
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 147 HP150 HP
Torque: 184 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds9.6 seconds
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 3 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.28.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
780 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Volkswagen Passat engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.77 m
Width: 1.80 m1.82 m
Height: 1.44 m1.52 m
Mazda 6 is smaller.
Mazda 6 is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres603 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1751 litresno data
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space.
Mazda 6 has 98 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9701`500
Safety:
Quality:
above average

below average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 30002200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Passat has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv