Mazda 6 2008 vs Subaru Outback 2003

 
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Subaru Outback
2003 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 140 HP173 HP
Torque: 330 NM227 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds10.9 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 33 HP less power than Subaru Outback, but torque is 103 NM more than Subaru Outback. Despite less power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.08.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km9.7 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway920 km on highway
960 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km370'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda 5Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.73 m
Width: 1.80 m1.77 m
Height: 1.44 m1.55 m
Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 505 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1751 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`110no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 32002600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Subaru Outback has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv