Mazda 6 2008 vs Audi A4 2008

 
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Audi A4
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 140 HP180 HP
Torque: 330 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds8.1 seconds
Audi A4 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 40 HP less power than Audi A4, but torque is 10 NM more than Audi A4. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.06.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km8.5 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1200 km on highway
960 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km360'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda 5Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A5, Audi Q5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Audi A4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.70 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 1 cm longer than the Audi A4, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres490 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1751 litresno data
Mazda 6 has 15 litres more trunk space than the Audi A4.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1102`060
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Audi A4 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Audi A4 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 30006200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Audi A4 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv