Mazda 6 2013 vs Volvo V60 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 55 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 17 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 72 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V60 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V60 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |