Mazda 6 2013 vs Volvo V70 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Mazda 6 engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V70. Despite less power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1630 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller. Mazda 6 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1580 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo V70, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volvo V70 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Volvo V70 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |