Mazda 6 2018 vs Subaru Outback 2017

 
Mazda 6
2018 -
Subaru Outback
2017 -
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 165 HP175 HP
Torque: 380 NM235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds10.2 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 10 HP less power than Subaru Outback, but torque is 145 NM more than Subaru Outback. Despite less power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.47.7
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1400 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1550 km on highway950 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.82 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.45 m1.68 m
Mazda 6 is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 23 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres512 litres
Subaru Outback has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 31 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1 metres more than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0052`100
Safety:
Subaru Outback scores higher in safety tests. The Subaru Outback scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 24 40026 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Subaru Outback has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv