Mazda 6 2018 vs Kia Optima 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 165 HP | 188 HP | |
Torque: | 213 NM | 241 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Kia Optima is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 23 HP less power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Kia Optima. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 8.3 | |
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
1140 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 1 cm longer than the Kia Optima, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 510 litres | |
Kia Optima has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 21 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Kia Optima, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`046 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | |||
Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 800 | 12 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Kia Optima has
| |